Resolving rule conflicts with double induction
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Resolving Rule Conflicts with Double Induction
When applying an unordered set of classification rules, the rules may assign more than one class to a particular example. Previous methods of resolving such conflicts between rules include using the most frequent class in the conflicting rules (as done in CN2) and using näıve Bayes to calculate the most probable class. An alternative way of solving this problem is presented in this paper: by ge...
متن کاملResolving Requirements Conflicts with Computer-Supported Negotiation
Conflict is an inevitable part of both requirements elicitation and system design. As McDermid points out elsewhere in this volume, requirements are negotiated, not captured. During this process, the participants will disagree over how to interpret features of the application domain, what the requirements for a new system are, and how to meet those requirements. Conventional analysis techniques...
متن کاملResolving conflicts with surrogate decision makers.
1 . Panchabhai TS , Dangayach NS , Krishnan A , Kothari VM , Karnad DR . Oropharyngeal cleansing with 0.2% chlorhexidine for prevention of nosocomial pneumonia in critically ill patients: an open-label randomized trial with 0.01% potassium permanganate as control . Chest . 2009 ; 135 ( 5 ): 1150 1156 . 2 . Koeman M , van der Ven AJ , Hak E , et al . Oral decontamination with chlorhexidine reduc...
متن کاملResolving Conflicts in Action Descriptions
We study resolving conflicts between an action description and a set of conditions (possibly obtained from observations), in the context of action languages. In this formal framework, the meaning of an action description can be represented by a transition diagram—a directed graph whose nodes correspond to states and whose edges correspond to transitions describing action occurrences. This allow...
متن کاملOn resolving Conflicts between Arguments
Argument systems are based on the idea that one can construct arguments for propositions structured reasons justifying the belief in a proposition. Using defeasible rules, arguments need not be valid in all circumstances, therefore, it might be possible to construct an argument for a proposition as well as its negation. When arguments support conflicting propositions, one of the arguments must ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Intelligent Data Analysis
سال: 2004
ISSN: 1571-4128,1088-467X
DOI: 10.3233/ida-2004-8503